Forums & Blog

Hi guys, anti-spam in 4.x works really well, and when using plus-addressing, it is easy to see who leaked your email address. The thing is though, that the spammers aren't stupid, so they can recognize plus-addressing. That's why I wanted to be able to change the + (plus) sign to something else...

I second that feature request. That would be a really sweet feature to add! As long as it is an option on Greylisting, people can turn it back on for SPF Pass if the Spam amount increases. /jp

Hey there, Since upgrading to SM4 I have been loving the improvements a great deal. Greylisting has reduced my spam a great deal, but in just the intrest of trying to speed up the legitimate mail I think there should be an option to skip greylisting on SPF passing. I know that this will potentially allow...

Is there any (easy) way to hide disabled accounts from the global address list? We have a policy of holding mailboxes for a year after an account is closed, just-in-case, but it's really cluttering up my global list. So, short of making a manual list & sharing it, is there a way to hide disabled...

I think having an automated way to "unmark spam" for a domain, rather than just per user, would be a good feature ... especially for corporate users that use SM For the spam service we all know that anything in your junk folder can be "unmarked as spam" and this adds the address to the trusted senders...