Forums & Blog

A SmarterTools-sponsored community.
Welcome to Forums & Blog Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

Last post 11-09-2009 3:33 AM by ramiss. 10 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 10-15-2009 8:53 AM

    • borg
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 10-12-2007
    • Posts 65

    SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    I was wondering if anyone has any clarification for shared web hosts on whether a mail server using SmarterMail is considered Outsourcing or Non-Outsourcing under Microsoft's very confusing outsourcing/non-outsourcing SPLA licensing?

    From what Microsoft are saying is that mail servers come under outsourcing which means if you use Windows server standard then the box with SmarterMail on will cost £50 per month rather than £12 for non-outsourcing box which are hosting websites, DNS, etc. and no mail server.

    Hopefully SmarterTools can findout from Microsoft as this huge price differences may force allot of people to use Linux Mail Servers instead rather than paying high fees to Microsoft to be able to host a SmarterMail Mail Server.

  • 10-15-2009 2:24 PM In reply to

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    From what I have been told MS doesnt recognize 3rd party products, so the extra price only pertains to Exchange. Again this is what was explained to me.
    Richard Amiss
    MightyBlue Hosting
    www.MightyBlue.com
  • 10-16-2009 12:28 AM In reply to

    • borg
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 10-12-2007
    • Posts 65

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    Thanks for your response.

    I've been talking about this on a number of other forums and it seems nearly everyone is being told from the Microsoft licensing that mail servers are outsourced.

    However everything else to do with shared hosting they are saying is non-outsourced, like website, DNS, Database, etc.

    The problem is that even Microsoft own Licensing Specialists don't understand the SPLA outsourced/non-outsourced licensing.

    Microsoft need to sortout their SPLA licensing and stop these sudden changes otherwise people are simply going to stop using Microsoft for hosting and start using Linux instead.

    Linux:
    Free with simple to understand licensing with no changes

    Micosft SPLA
    Expensive with very confusing licensing and constant price and licensing changes with no notice

    I've already been warned to expect a doubling in the price of the DataCenter version of Windows Server in January, but official word on this will not be till around 15th January. So if you are using DataCenter, like we do for virtual servers, expect a huge price rise in your licensing.

  • 10-16-2009 12:43 PM In reply to

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    Yeah, upon further research, it does appear that running SM on a windows server will classify the server as Outsourced. This is scary and can easily bankrupt small hosting proider. The only 2 ways out I see are: 1) MS drops this insanity or 2) ST grants each customer IP rights. Looks like we will be researching Linux solutions.
    Richard Amiss
    MightyBlue Hosting
    www.MightyBlue.com
  • 10-19-2009 3:38 AM In reply to

    • borg
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 10-12-2007
    • Posts 65

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    It would be good if SmarterTools could get some clarification on how their software is seen by Microsoft under SPLA as this could servilely impact their sales as most people will be running SmarterMail on a server that is licensed under SPLA and if everyone is having to pay Microsoft £50 ($100) a month for the privileged SmarterMail will be an expensive option.

  • 10-19-2009 4:14 PM In reply to

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

     Here is the official wording from Microsoft.

    How do I know if I am and Outsourcer or Non-Outsourcer?
    The definition of Outsourcing is an application or service which a service provider manages on behalf of its customer. For the purposes of this definition, the managed application or service is:

    • Used by its customer's employees, contractoers, agents, or vendors, and
    • Not the Service Provider's intellectual property

    So, for me, it raises my licensing from around $150 a month to over $700 a month. I can no longer afford SmarterMail, SmarterStats, or SmarterTrack. If I want to stay legal, I will muct swich to all Linux hosting otherwise its go out of business. I dont know what Microsoft is thinking but this will put a hurting on all small web hosts.

  • 10-22-2009 8:22 AM In reply to

    • ST-JHardy
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 01-19-2007
    • Phoenix, Arizona
    • Posts 79

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    Hello all -

    We think that the issue may not be fully resolved.  We did a bit of reasearch into the new terminology and that lead to a related blog post that you can find here:

    http://www.smartertools.com/blog/archive/2009/10/21/understanding-the-new-outsourced-and-non-outsourced-microsoft-spla-licensing-for-windows-server.aspx

    The active discussion is vital on this issue.  We look forward to your continued comments.

    Jeff Hardy
    Vice President of Marketing
    SmarterTools Inc.
    (877) 357-6278
    www.smartertools.com

    SmarterMail - Windows Mail Server and Microsoft Exchange Alternative
    SmarterTrack - Help Desk, Ticket Tracking, Live Chat, WhosOn, and Knowledge Base Software
    SmarterStats - Web Log Analytics and SEO Software
  • 10-24-2009 3:35 PM In reply to

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    This PDF may be helpful:

    https://h40095.www4.hp.com/Phoenix/P..._Licensing.pdf

    It specifically addresses shared web hosting non-outsourcing.

    Also, the terms for the Windows Server "Web" SKU have not changed, so that might be a way to host applications such as SmarterMail. The relevant portion of the SPUR seems to lead me to believe that this is indeed the case:
    __________________________

    For Windows Web Server 2008 R2:

    The total number of software licenses required for a server equals the sum of the software licenses required under (i) and (ii) below.
    i. To run one instance of the server software at any one time in either one physical operating system environment or one virtual operating system environment on a server, you need a software license for each physical processor on that server.
    ii. To run each additional instance of the server software at any one time in either one physical operating system environment or one virtual operating system environment, you need a software license for each physical processor on that server.

    Limitations on Use.

    The software may be used solely as an Internet-accessible front-end web server for development and deployment of the following:
    • Web pages
    • Web sites
    • Web applications
    • Web services
    • POP3 mail serving

    You may run database engine software on an instance of the software solely to support applications running on the same instance of the software. You may run web server software (for example, Microsoft Internet Information Services), management or security agents (for example, the MOM agent) on an instance of the software.

    Any other usage of the software is not permitted.
    ___________________________________________

    I know it says "POP3 mail serving" but I suspect IMAP/WebMail would be permitted as well.

    For a comparison of the Windows Server Web 2008 R2 tech specs vs. other Windows editions, go to:


  • 10-25-2009 1:03 AM In reply to

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    mikeb@tulsaconnect.com:
    I know it says "POP3 mail serving" but I suspect IMAP/WebMail would be permitted as well.
     

    We can only hope!

     

    Richard Amiss
    MightyBlue Hosting
    www.MightyBlue.com
  • 11-07-2009 11:35 PM In reply to

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

    One option, at least for those of us who have been in SPLA for a while, is to avoid the issue by continuing to use Windows Server 2003 according to the older use rights. But, this option is NOT available to new SPLA members.

    "If a Service Provider wants to continue with the pre-July 2009 Windows Server use rights, the Service Provider must:
    • Continue offering their software service with that version of Windows Server.
    • Continue to report the same stock-keeping units (SKUs) as prior to July 2009."

  • 11-09-2009 3:33 AM In reply to

    Re: SmarterMail and Microsoft SPLA Licensing

     Oh good. So Microsoft is encouraging us to not upgrade or add new servers...brilliant!

    Richard Amiss
    MightyBlue Hosting
    www.MightyBlue.com
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)